![gbtimelapse vs lrtimelapse gbtimelapse vs lrtimelapse](http://files.photops.com:81/attachment/Mon_1812/57_562936_bb23871cf39a8a6.png)
- #GBTIMELAPSE VS LRTIMELAPSE FULL#
- #GBTIMELAPSE VS LRTIMELAPSE SOFTWARE#
- #GBTIMELAPSE VS LRTIMELAPSE TRIAL#
#GBTIMELAPSE VS LRTIMELAPSE TRIAL#
Granted, this was single test on two sequences )however it is clear that using LRTimelapse and Lightroom is faster than using just Lightroom.ĭownload a free trial or buy a copy of LRTimelapse here. That is 3 times faster than using just Lightroom. The total duration of this process was 1 minute and 30 seconds. This is a lot more work and quite a few more steps however, the results speak for themselves. Then I copy/pasted the settings of the first photo on to the last photo and saved the metadata for these two edited photos.īack in LRTimelapse I clicked Reload, then Auto Transition, followed by Save. I then selected the entire sequence in Lightroom and read the metadata (right click > metadata > read metadata), followed by colour grading/editing the first photo. I initialised the sequence in LRTimelapse, added a keyframe at the start and end of the sequence using the Keyframe Wizard and saved the metadata. I opened up a similar 250 photo sequence in LRTimelapse and followed the basic workflow. The total duration of this process was 4 minutes and 30 seconds. I then copy/pasted or synchronised the settings on to the rest of the sequence. I colour graded one photo from 250 photo timelapse sequence.
#GBTIMELAPSE VS LRTIMELAPSE FULL#
Tests were done on a full spec 2015 Macbook Pro (2,8 GHz Intel Core i7, 16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3, working on an external SSD drive) running the latest OS with the latest versions of Lightroom and LRTimelapse.
![gbtimelapse vs lrtimelapse gbtimelapse vs lrtimelapse](http://files.photops.com:81/attachment/Mon_1812/57_562936_8b17f2a82050c99.png)
Martin's post production workflow goes from RAW sequence > TIFF sequence > video file, whereas mine goes from RAW sequence > video file.īecause of Martin's different approach he hadn't noticed this change in performance yet, which makes sense because he applies his (batch) colour grading to the photo sequences at a different stage in his post production workflow. Martin has a different timelapse editing workflow than me which requires the use of LRTimelapse. Finding a solutionĪfter talking to my friend and fellow timelapse photographer Martin Heck from Timestorm Films I decided to run some tests using LRTimelapse to figure out how we can speed up Lightroom for timelapse editing.
#GBTIMELAPSE VS LRTIMELAPSE SOFTWARE#
It appears the engineering team behind the software overlooked timelapse photographers (understandable, we are a bit of a niche) when redesigning the software. With the latest version(s) of Adobe Lightroom this action now takes minutes instead of seconds.) Alternatively you select the single photo, as well as the rest of the photo's sequence and choose Synchronise Settings. In Lightroom you can choose to copy and paste the settings from one photo on to the rest of the photo's sequence. Instead of colour grading every photo separately, a batch edit is done across every sequence. These sequences of photos are then colour graded and rendered into a video file.
![gbtimelapse vs lrtimelapse gbtimelapse vs lrtimelapse](https://lrtimelapse.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/LRTPT3_57_Flashlight4-720x360.jpg)
Timelapse photography consists of shooting a large number of photos at a fixed interval over an extended period of time. I realise that this technically isn't speeding up Lightroom however I worded it that way for SEO purposes so that more people would find this solution. This article explores a different workflow to increase your efficiency when editing timelapse sequences. The ‘copy/paste settings' or ‘synchronise settings' action now takes minutes instead of seconds. With the latest versions of Adobe Lightroom a very frustrating and time consuming bug has crept into the software. In this article I will explain how you can speed up Lightroom for timelapse editing.